Cinephilia Home
  Specializing in independent, art-house, cult, classic and Australian films


 

 

 

 

 


New On DVD

Repo Man

Insignificance

Parade

Missing

Nosferatu

All I Desire

All That Heaven Allows

Paranoid Park

Night And Fog

Silent Running

Dark Star

Where The Green Ants Dream

Imitation Of Life

3:10 To Yuma

more...  


Devolution Web Hosting


Website Design and Hosting by Devolution

Cinephilosophy On the other side of our eyeballs
Bernard Hemingway's Two Cents:

How many times have you read a review praising a film to the skies, gone to see it and it's a stinker? What's going on? The bottom line is there are no objective criteria when it comes to likes and dislikes. A film review is a justification of someone's likes and dislikes, a reflection of their experience and values. Hopefully, with a bit of erudition thrown in.

Generally speaking, I rate each film as a good (or bad) instance of its type - thriller, comedy, drama, etc, not as a movie per se. Thus, Withnail and I has the same rating as Magnolia, ie. for me both are (roughly) equally successful within their style. This is not an entirely satisfactory approach, however, no approach is. Some genres have inherently more potential as art than others - the 'high' form of drama as opposed the 'low' form of comedy, for instance. This makes it rather confusing to simply apply the best-of-its-kind approach to rating films. Thus I tend to reserve the highest rating (4.5 - 5 stars) for films that achieve more than comparative stylistic success and add to the finest that cinema, as an art form, has to offer. Understandably there are few such films in any given year. Of course, underpinning these general precepts is a host of judgements and preferences (for more about my views on film reviewing see the link below). Thus, I have a liking for films, whatever their stylistic approach may be, that explore the contradictory, troubled aspects of life or that have a melancholy, even tragic view, of the human comedy. A film's primary value for me depends on what the people (often concealed behind the symbolically autonomous figure of "The Director") who have made it have to say. How and how well they say it is a highly contingent affair. In the best films form and content come together seamlessly but content is its sustaining heart.

For more about my views on film reviewing by clicking here.

You can read more about my views on film by clicking here.

And here's a list of my favourite 22 films, alpha-listed:

Apocalypse Now (Francis Ford Coppola, 1979)
Brazil (Terry Gilliam, 1985)
Broadway Danny Rose (Woody Allen, 1984)
Chinatown (Roman Polanski, 1974)
Death In Venice (Luchino Visconti, 197i)
Enfants du Paradis, Les(Marcel Carné, 1945)
Gertrud(Carl Dreyer, 1964)
Hustler, The (Robert Rosen, 1961)
Last Picture Show, The (Peter Bogdanovich, 1971)
Metropolis (Fritz Lang, 1927)
Midnight Cowboy (John Schlesinger, 1969)
Naked (Mike Leigh, 1993)
Performance (Donald Camell & Nicholas Roeg, 1970)
Point Blank (John Boorman, 1967)
Ran (Akira Kurosawa, 1985)
Spirit of the Beehive, The / Espíritu de la Colmena, El (Victor Erice, 1973)
Time of the Gypsies (Emir Kustarica, 1989)
Tous Les Matins du Monde (Alain Corneau, 1991)
Toy Story (John Lassetter, 1995)
Withnail And I (Bruce Robinson, 1987)
Wizard of Oz, The (Victor Fleming, 1939)

<<<  the big screen >>>


Website Design and Hosting by Devolution